Correctional institutions · Maryland

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown

Hagerstown, MD · ~265 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade D.

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown: 5.2 TCR = 163% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown safety composite

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown held a steady TCR band

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown's TCR held near 0.0 from 5.6 in 2022 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.6 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Hagerstown, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 163% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO Maryland Correctiona…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~265 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maryland Correctional Training Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown averages 5.2 TCR (163% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown TCR series: 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Correctional institutions employers in Maryland.

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown (265 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown
Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown (265 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Maryland Correctional Institution- Hagerstown has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 2.2 20 3 0
2023 4.5 1.9 12 0 0
2022 5.6 0.9 18 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MD · Hagerstown

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 205 employers in Hagerstown, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maryland Correctional Training Center 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenville County Detention 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASPC-Yuma 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDCR CCHCS Central Region - 083 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CHEVERLY MD 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1893 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE HNVAMD14 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE FutureCare Rehabilitation Services 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Health 2,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Medical Center 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-HAGE 1,921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Volvo Group Trucks Operations - Hagerstown, Maryland 1,592 FTE
NAT-TCR Mount Vernon District Office 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Veolia WTS 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Absolute Delivery Services LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Renaissance Boston Waterfront Hotel 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Winters 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orgill Rome Distribution Center 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE InterMed Gannett Drive 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cenovus Energy Superior Refining Company 265 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.