Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Maryland

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc.

Baltimore, MD · ~54 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 55% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. safety composite

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #34/121
  • PHOTO Winger Contracting C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Winger Contracting Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (55% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 121 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Maryland.

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. (54 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. (54 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Maryland Mechanical Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.2 3.5 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MD · Baltimore

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Winger Contracting Company 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ahern Twin Cities 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hiller Charleston 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-25 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conowingo 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE FiberPlus, Inc. 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Gunter Construction 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Carson Valley Inn 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gates 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IDT Tools 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE VSF Corporation 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Transit 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dixon Construction 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tech Etch Litchfield 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.