Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · California

Master Cooling Corporation

Moorpark, CA · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Master Cooling Corporation runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Master Cooling Corporation: 2.8 TCR = 100% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Master Cooling Corporation safety composite

Master Cooling Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Master Cooling Corporation: 0.0 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 3.18× in 2024

Master Cooling Corporation's TCR rose 8.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 8.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 3.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Moorpark, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 100% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #216/594
  • PHOTO Matrix HG, Inc. Novato
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Matrix HG, Inc. Novato (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Master Cooling Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Master Cooling Corporation averages 2.8 TCR (100% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Master Cooling Corporation TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=9 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=8.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Master Cooling Corporation falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #216 safest of 594 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in California.

Master Cooling Corporation (32 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Master Cooling Corporation
Master Cooling Corporation (32 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Master Cooling Corporation has fewer employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.9 8.9 2 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2022 9.0 9.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Moorpark

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 54 employers in Moorpark, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Matrix HG, Inc. Novato 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shapiro & Duncan field 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minton and Roberson Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR J Geyer Plumbing, Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schreiner Farms 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIVE POINTS T.I.C. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE OFFICE 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brocchini Farms Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 578 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PENTAIR WATER POOL & SPA INC. 623 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAJCO INC DBA BIG BRAND TIRE & SERVICE 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benchmark Electronics Moorpark 213 FTE
NAT-TCR Airport 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cofield Soy Crushing 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Faribault High School 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Digital Imaging 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boyd Ready Mix, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kelly Fabricators Corp. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Abrasives, Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.