Commercial building construction general contractors · California

Matt Construction Corporation

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~176 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Matt Construction Corporation runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Matt Construction Corporation: 0.7 TCR = 23% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Matt Construction Corporation safety composite

Matt Construction Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2024

Matt Construction Corporation injury rate improved

Matt Construction Corporation's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.5 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=2.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Santa Fe Springs, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #55/486
  • PHOTO BETCO
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BETCO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Matt Construction Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Matt Construction Corporation averages 0.7 TCR (23% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Matt Construction Corporation TCR series: 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=2.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Matt Construction Corporation falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 486 Commercial building constructi employers in California.

Matt Construction Corporation (176 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Matt Construction Corporation
Matt Construction Corporation (176 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Matt Construction Corporation has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 1.8 1 3 0
2019 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2017 0.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BETCO 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Office 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Doss Brothers Construction, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dabbs-Williams General Contractors, LLC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. View Ag 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-South Bay S/C 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 2311 FAIRFAX 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSI 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Barriere Construction Co., L.L.C. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR OSHA 300A - Michigan 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR West Chicago Campus 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hertless Brothers Roofing, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metro Transit MJR Garage 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA IL Chicago Plant 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honeywell International Inc Geismar LA 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Specialty Contractors 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.