Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Pennsylvania

MAX International

Lancaster, PA · ~31 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MAX International runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

MAX International: 8.9 TCR = 270% of Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MAX International safety composite

MAX International scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−68.4

2017→2020

MAX International injury rate improved

MAX International's TCR fell 68.4 from 76.9 in 2017 to 8.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 76.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=76.9 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=8.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 270% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #20/20
  • PHOTO Converted Products I…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Converted Products Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

MAX International in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MAX International averages 8.9 TCR (270% of the Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MAX International TCR series: 2017=76.9 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=8.5 · BLS 3.3

Where MAX International falls in its industry

236 Paper products (except office establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 20 Paper products (except office employers in Pennsylvania.

MAX International (31 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MAX International
MAX International (31 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

MAX International has fewer employees than the Paper products (except office supply), d median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.5 2.8 3 0 0
2019 8.4 8.4 3 0 0
2018 9.8 0.0 3 0 0
2017 76.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · PA · Lancaster

236 Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Converted Products Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pap-R Products (Casey) 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITB Packaging 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFC Manufacturing Group LLC dba Tru Cut LLC 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spawn Plant 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest Mushrooms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLSC Cocalico Service Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenixville Service Building 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR ACT Towing, LLC 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Center Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Towson 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hovingh Concrete Inc. 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE R-114 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE County of Stafford-Landfill 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weitron, Newark Office 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lauyans & Co on Chestnut 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.