Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Minnesota

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin

Austin, MN · ~930 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin: 5.3 TCR = 71% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin safety composite

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin: 4.4 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2023

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin's TCR rose 1.3 from 4.4 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Austin, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 5.3 · 71% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #118/249
  • PHOTO AdventHealth Central…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 265 inj
  • SIZE ~930 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AdventHealth Central Texas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin averages 5.3 TCR (71% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin TCR series: 2017=4.4 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=5 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=5.7 · BLS 7.5

Where Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #118 safest of 249 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin (930 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin
Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin (930 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Mayo Clinic Health System-Austin has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.7 2.2 33 1 0
2022 5.7 1.5 43 0 0
2021 5.4 2.8 38 3 0
2020 5.8 2.0 40 3 0
2019 5.0 1.6 38 0 0
2018 5.3 1.8 40 2 0
2017 4.4 1.8 33 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MN · Austin

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Austin, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Central Texas 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harney District Hospital 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3638-A 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3638-K 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MNMPL - MAPLE GROVE 932 FTE
STATE-SIZE CentraCare Health Plaza 928 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Minneapolis Police Dept. 933 FTE
STATE-SIZE Q3 Contracting 926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods - Austin 1,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods - Austin Plant 1,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods Corporation 1,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quality Pork Processors Inc. 1,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Conns DC-Dallas 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City UT - 1760 N 2200 W Suite #30 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR American Custom Metal Fabricating, Inc 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FAU/Mac Arthur Campus* 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Caesars Southern Indiana 930 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marsden South, LLC 930 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville Hub (Tnmas) 930 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATI Specialty Materials - Monroe 930 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.