Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge

Mankato, MN · ~91 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade D.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge: 4.9 TCR = 128% of Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge safety composite

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge: 2.3 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.46× in 2019

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge's TCR rose 2.2 from 2.3 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 128% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #253/419
  • PHOTO GRACE HEALTH INC - M…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GRACE HEALTH INC - MICHIGAN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge averages 4.9 TCR (128% of the Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge falls in its industry

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e. establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #253 safest of 419 Family physicians' offices (e. employers in Minnesota.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge (91 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge
Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge (91 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mayo Clinic Health System-Eastridge has more employees than the Family physicians' offices (e.g., center median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.5 2.3 4 0 0
2018 7.8 1.1 6 1 0
2017 2.3 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Mankato

2,836 Family physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GRACE HEALTH INC - MICHIGAN 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AU Health System, Inc South Carolina office 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Multnomah County Bldg 437 / Multnomah Co. East 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edwards County Medical Center 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Boy Farms, LLP 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate Improvement, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE RJ Mechanical Inc 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harty Mechanical 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Doughty Valley Factory Store Office 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Westside Community Focus Administration 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 114 - Midwest City 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 133 ABC Supply Co., Inc 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peak Home Care Inc dba Home Instead Senior Care 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE PMCO Eugene 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilldrup Companies - Richmond 606 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE AristaCare @ Hillsdale Park 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.