Anchored earth retention contractors · Indiana

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc.

New Albany, IN · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Anchored earth retention contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 30% of Anchored earth retention contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. safety composite

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2020→2022

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. injury rate improved

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · New Albany, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/21
  • PHOTO Sasol Chemicals Hous…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sasol Chemicals Houston TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (30% of the Anchored earth retention contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. TCR series: 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. falls in its industry

932 Anchored earth retention contr establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 21 Anchored earth retention contr employers in Indiana.

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. (54 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc.
McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. (54 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

McCrite Milling and Construction Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Anchored earth retention contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · IN · New Albany

932 Anchored earth retention contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 88 employers in New Albany, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sasol Chemicals Houston TX 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR APTIM @ Flint Hills - Pine Bend 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR OFFICE 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Dredge & Dock 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Indianapolis 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardmore TC Service Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark County REMC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 800-DREES-INDIANAPOLIS 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Floyd 1,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samtec 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYX New Albany 675 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cenveo Discount Labels 521 FTE
NAT-TCR 4325 Springfield Container 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR WW-TRL-WOODWARD 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1046 Kalihi 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Greensboro (formerly Twisted Paper Packaging) 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenfield Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversified Painting 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 56th Street Production 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burnsville PN Clinic 14050 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.