Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

McFarland Villa Assisted Living

Mcfarland, WI · ~20 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McFarland Villa Assisted Living runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

McFarland Villa Assisted Living: 8.4 TCR = 220% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McFarland Villa Assisted Living safety composite

McFarland Villa Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

McFarland Villa Assisted Living: 13.9 → 20.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 20.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2023

McFarland Villa Assisted Living's TCR rose 6.4 from 13.9 in 2016 to 20.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mcfarland, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 220% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #198/273
  • PHOTO The Arbors at Hauppa…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Arbors at Hauppauge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

McFarland Villa Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McFarland Villa Assisted Living averages 8.4 TCR (220% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McFarland Villa Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=13.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=11.7 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=20.3 · BLS 3.8

Where McFarland Villa Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #198 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

McFarland Villa Assisted Living (20 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate McFarland Villa Assisted Living
McFarland Villa Assisted Living (20 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

McFarland Villa Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 20.3 6.8 3 0 0
2022 5.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 11.7 0.0 2 0 0
2019 6.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 13.9 13.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Mcfarland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 17 employers in Mcfarland, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Arbors at Hauppauge 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL-Laketown Village 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-62058 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10788 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alsum Farms Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FGI West Salem 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 760 Durand Agronomy 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 764 Osseo Agronomy 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Wisconsin - McFarland 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perfect Puzzle LLC 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR 534-00394 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR KS Energy Services (Madison) 61 FTE
NAT-TCR Bronco Billys Casino and Hotel 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR North Valley Farm services 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100423 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CRM Plant 307 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 2481 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 2458 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 2380 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 2185 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.