Distribution of electric power · Pennsylvania

McKeesport Service Center

Pittsburgh, PA · ~61 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

McKeesport Service Center runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

McKeesport Service Center: 1.7 TCR = 145% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

McKeesport Service Center safety composite

McKeesport Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2024

McKeesport Service Center injury rate improved

McKeesport Service Center's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 145% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/58
  • PHOTO FT WORTH NORTH SVC CTR
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FT WORTH NORTH SVC CTR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

McKeesport Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows McKeesport Service Center averages 1.7 TCR (145% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

McKeesport Service Center TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=3 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where McKeesport Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 58 Distribution of electric power employers in Pennsylvania.

McKeesport Service Center (61 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate McKeesport Service Center
McKeesport Service Center (61 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

McKeesport Service Center has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.1 0.0 1 1 0
2021 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.4 4.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · PA · Pittsburgh

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FT WORTH NORTH SVC CTR 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AES Indiana (T&D) - Morris St Service Center 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Grove - APC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clinton Network 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Connellsville 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forino Co., LP 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hallstrom Construction Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fehlinger Construction Group, LLC. 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR ACCO Brands - Booneville 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Canton 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Andax Industries, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HES Lemont 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big River Resources Galva, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tomorrow's Children Inc 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pharmacy-Lite Prescription Packaging - Ohio Plant 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE XWK 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.