Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Meadow Lakes Senior Living

Rochester, MN · ~43 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meadow Lakes Senior Living runs at 331% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Meadow Lakes Senior Living: 12.6 TCR = 331% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meadow Lakes Senior Living safety composite

Meadow Lakes Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Meadow Lakes Senior Living: 2.7 → 17.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 17.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2023

Meadow Lakes Senior Living's TCR rose 14.8 from 2.7 in 2018 to 17.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Rochester, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 331% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #170/226
  • PHOTO Heritage Woods of Bo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Woods of Bolingbrook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Meadow Lakes Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meadow Lakes Senior Living averages 12.6 TCR (331% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meadow Lakes Senior Living TCR series: 2018=2.7 · 2019=15.7 · 2020=17.8 · 2021=9.6 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=17.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Meadow Lakes Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #170 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Meadow Lakes Senior Living (43 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Meadow Lakes Senior Living
Meadow Lakes Senior Living (43 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Meadow Lakes Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 17.4 7.0 5 0 0
2022 12.2 0.0 2 1 0
2021 9.6 3.2 2 1 0
2020 17.8 14.2 4 1 0
2019 15.7 0.0 3 0 0
2018 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Rochester

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of Bolingbrook 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redstone Village Main Campus 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Estrella Estates 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Springs at Wilsonville 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR TIS - VA - Emporia 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trilogy Home Healthcare - Sarasota 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0020-03625 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01709 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rancho San Miguel - Broadway 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenwood Place 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCO-E22 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neumiller Electric, Inc. 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.