Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Iowa

MeadowView Memory Care Village

Cedar Rapids, IA · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MeadowView Memory Care Village runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

MeadowView Memory Care Village: 8.5 TCR = 223% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MeadowView Memory Care Village safety composite

MeadowView Memory Care Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MeadowView Memory Care Village: 7.8 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 17.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2024

MeadowView Memory Care Village's TCR rose 0.7 from 7.8 in 2016 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cedar Rapids, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 223% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #49/70
  • PHOTO Capetown Assisted Li…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Capetown Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

MeadowView Memory Care Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MeadowView Memory Care Village averages 8.5 TCR (223% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MeadowView Memory Care Village TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2018=17.5 · 2022=0 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where MeadowView Memory Care Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 70 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Iowa.

MeadowView Memory Care Village (47 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate MeadowView Memory Care Village
MeadowView Memory Care Village (47 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

MeadowView Memory Care Village has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 8.6 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 17.5 13.1 3 1 0
2016 7.8 7.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IA · Cedar Rapids

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 466 employers in Cedar Rapids, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Capetown Assisted Living 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Haven Manor Home for Adults 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Watertown Square 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Glen 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE DeJong Greenhouse LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Des Moines Office 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldfield 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Centrum Valley Farms South 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins (Cedar Rapids IA 400 NE) 6,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids C Ave 6,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRST EXPEDITED INC 3,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
NAT-TCR Manufacturer of Fine Hardwood Floors 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Popeyes 11766 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Green Recycling 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Frisbie Memorial Hospital 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Perfection Group, Inc., Knoxville 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ozark Electric Cooperative- Mount Vernon Office 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big River Vineyards, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hankscraft Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.