Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

The Residence at Watertown Square

Watertown, MA · ~84 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Watertown Square runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residence at Watertown Square: 8.5 TCR = 223% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Watertown Square safety composite

The Residence at Watertown Square scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Residence at Watertown Square: 3.1 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024

The Residence at Watertown Square's TCR rose 9.3 from 3.1 in 2016 to 12.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Watertown, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 223% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #109/210
  • PHOTO Capetown Assisted Li…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Capetown Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Watertown Square in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Watertown Square averages 8.5 TCR (223% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Watertown Square TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=7.3 · 2024=12.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Watertown Square falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

The Residence at Watertown Square (84 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Watertown Square
The Residence at Watertown Square (84 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Residence at Watertown Square has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.4 3.3 14 1 0
2021 7.3 5.5 4 0 0
2020 8.7 3.5 4 1 0
2019 8.7 3.5 4 1 0
2018 10.7 5.4 5 1 0
2016 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Watertown

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 43 employers in Watertown, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Capetown Assisted Living 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Haven Manor Home for Adults 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MeadowView Memory Care Village 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Glen 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mystic 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windover Construction 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE HWE Stoughton Insulation 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE James W. Flett Co., Inc 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR J.C. Cannistraro LLC 773 FTE
CITY-NEAR WATERTOWN (MAWAT) 531 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAWAT - WATERTOWN 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1442 - Watertown 314 FTE
NAT-TCR Metro Green Recycling 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Popeyes 11766 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MeadowView Memory Care Village 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturer of Fine Hardwood Floors 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crypton LLC 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE County Administration 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melbourne Fl 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chandler, AZ 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.