Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Metro Green Recycling

Atlanta, GA · ~52 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metro Green Recycling runs at 385% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Metro Green Recycling: 8.5 TCR = 385% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metro Green Recycling safety composite

Metro Green Recycling scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2019→2024

Metro Green Recycling injury rate improved

Metro Green Recycling's TCR fell 3.2 from 6.3 in 2019 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.3 · 2021=17.4 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 385% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #45/49
  • PHOTO Elizabeth Facility
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elizabeth Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Metro Green Recycling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metro Green Recycling averages 8.5 TCR (385% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metro Green Recycling TCR series: 2019=6.3 · 2021=17.4 · 2022=11.3 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Metro Green Recycling falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 49 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in Georgia.

Metro Green Recycling (52 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Metro Green Recycling
Metro Green Recycling (52 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Metro Green Recycling has more employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2023 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2022 11.3 3.2 7 0 0
2021 17.4 12.4 7 0 0
2019 6.3 4.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · GA · Atlanta

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elizabeth Facility 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAVID HIRSCHBERG STEEL COMPANY 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farnsworth 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR JRS 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cleveland Hatchery (CV) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transmission Support PC Field Services Maintenance Reliability 160 Lake Mirror Road Forest Park 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesboro Operating - 111 Stockyard Rd. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton Realty of Georgia - Atlanta East - Atlanta Realty 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR The Residence at Watertown Square 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Popeyes 11766 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MeadowView Memory Care Village 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturer of Fine Hardwood Floors 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newton County Development Landfill 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bayside Insulation & Construction, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Altoona- Parks 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone RV Company - Plant 18 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.