County supervisors' and executives' offices · Minnesota

Meeker County Courthouse

Litchfield, MN · ~121 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meeker County Courthouse runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical County supervisors' and executives' offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Meeker County Courthouse: 6.5 TCR = 203% of County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meeker County Courthouse safety composite

Meeker County Courthouse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Meeker County Courthouse: 7.8 → 15.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2024

Meeker County Courthouse's TCR rose 7.7 from 7.8 in 2017 to 15.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Litchfield, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 203% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #85/139
  • PHOTO City of Lacey Mainte…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Lacey Maintenance Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Meeker County Courthouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meeker County Courthouse averages 6.5 TCR (203% of the County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meeker County Courthouse TCR series: 2017=7.8 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=5 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=15.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Meeker County Courthouse falls in its industry

1,010 County supervisors' and execut establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 139 County supervisors' and execut employers in Minnesota.

Meeker County Courthouse (121 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Meeker County Courthouse
Meeker County Courthouse (121 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Meeker County Courthouse has fewer employees than the County supervisors' and executives' offi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.5 3.6 10 3 0
2023 6.4 1.8 5 2 0
2022 3.7 1.8 4 0 0
2021 5.0 2.0 5 0 0
2020 5.1 0.0 6 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 1 0
2018 6.5 2.8 7 0 0
2017 7.8 3.9 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · MN · Litchfield

1,010 County supervisors' and executives' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 48 employers in Litchfield, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Lacey Maintenance Shop 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Florence 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Hall/General Government 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Greensboro- Finance 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Civil Group 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE PW-Transportation Project Delivery 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meyer Contracting Inc. 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson Anderson 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litchfield ISD #465 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litchfield, MN 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Doosan Litchfield 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4374 214 FTE
NAT-TCR Pepsi Cola Bottling Co of Brookfield, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gosiger Machine Tools, LLC Northwest 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Younger Brothers Components, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Battaglia Distributing Corp Inc 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Imac Construction Inc. 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant DJ 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency Technologies - Austell 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alger Precision Machining LLC 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.