Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Regency Technologies - Austell

Austell, GA · ~121 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Technologies - Austell runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Regency Technologies - Austell: 2.0 TCR = 89% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Technologies - Austell safety composite

Regency Technologies - Austell scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Regency Technologies - Austell: 1.1 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.36× in 2024

Regency Technologies - Austell's TCR rose 1.5 from 1.1 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Austell, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.0 · 89% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #21/49
  • PHOTO Elgin Recycling Elec…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elgin Recycling Electronics Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Regency Technologies - Austell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Technologies - Austell averages 2.0 TCR (89% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Technologies - Austell TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Regency Technologies - Austell falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 49 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in Georgia.

Regency Technologies - Austell (121 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Technologies - Austell
Regency Technologies - Austell (121 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Regency Technologies - Austell has more employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 3 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2021 3.2 2.4 4 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2019 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · GA · Austell

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 113 employers in Austell, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elgin Recycling Electronics Warehouse 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Recycling LLC New Orleans 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SSP Sacramento 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SA Recycling Decatur 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Joliet 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Latex Construction Company 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Circle Group, LLC 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ampro Products Inc 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Cobb Hospital 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Six Flags Over Georgia 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATLANTA OPERA WAREHOUSE 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plateau Excavation, Inc 762 FTE
NAT-TCR freewaywarehouse 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkeley Glenn Elementary School 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St Paul Distribution Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Slackwood Elementary School k-3 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Imac Construction Inc. 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meyer Contracting Inc. 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meeker County Courthouse 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Edina - City Hall 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.