Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Florida

Melbourne G.I. Center

Melbourne, FL · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Melbourne G.I. Center runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Melbourne G.I. Center: 5.0 TCR = 67% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Melbourne G.I. Center safety composite

Melbourne G.I. Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2018→2024

Melbourne G.I. Center injury rate improved

Melbourne G.I. Center's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.7 · 2019=10.0 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Melbourne, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 5.0 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #168/350
  • PHOTO Mount Carmel East Ho…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mount Carmel East Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Melbourne G.I. Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Melbourne G.I. Center averages 5.0 TCR (67% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Melbourne G.I. Center TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=10 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 7.5

Where Melbourne G.I. Center falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 350 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Florida.

Melbourne G.I. Center (30 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Melbourne G.I. Center
Melbourne G.I. Center (30 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Melbourne G.I. Center has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2022 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.8 5.4 2 0 0
2019 10.0 10.0 2 0 0
2018 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · FL · Melbourne

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mount Carmel East Hospital 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 42200001-422002 ST JOSEPH REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR University of Louisville Hospital 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincolnhealth/St.Andrews 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACTION SOD & LANDSCAPE GARDENS 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turf Sales of Florida 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bees Florida 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Breakthru Beverage South Carolina - Greer 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Threshold Enterprises 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Propak - Tulsa, OK 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wyrulec Company 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE G3 Enterprises, Inc. - ColloPack Solutions 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinnacle HR Group, LLC - Highland Creek 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residual Materials, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berry Global 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.