Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) · North Carolina

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital

Charlotte, NC · ~155 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) workplace, earning a grade D.

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital: 4.7 TCR = 124% of Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital safety composite

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2018

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital injury rate improved

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital's TCR fell 5.3 from 7.7 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 124% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/22
  • PHOTO Select Specialty Hos…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~155 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Select Specialty Hospital - Pontiac, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mercy Restorative Care Hospital averages 4.7 TCR (124% of the Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=4 · 2018=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Mercy Restorative Care Hospital falls in its industry

1,390 Hospitals, specialty (except p establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 22 Hospitals, specialty (except p employers in North Carolina.

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital (155 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mercy Restorative Care Hospital
Mercy Restorative Care Hospital (155 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Mercy Restorative Care Hospital has fewer employees than the Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.4 0.0 0 2 0
2017 4.0 1.0 4 0 0
2016 7.7 3.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · NC · Charlotte

1,390 Hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Pontiac, Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baptist Health Extended Care Hospital 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Rehabilitation Institute of St Louis 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Hospital of Minneapolis, LLC 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BU 3433 - I-440 Beltline Widen-Wake Cnty 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Downlite 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Fraser, Armour 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverlake Facility 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 3239 Keystone 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland - SB 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Electrical Contractor Incorperated 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Milan Supply Chain Solutions 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harrisburg Distribution Center 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Supply Smyrna 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gas Power Systems : Metem - Parsippany, NJ, USA 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain : Dayton, OH - Systems 155 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.