Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Sundial Assisted Living

Redding, CA · ~33 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sundial Assisted Living runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sundial Assisted Living: 9.3 TCR = 244% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sundial Assisted Living safety composite

Sundial Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.1

2016→2020

Sundial Assisted Living injury rate improved

Sundial Assisted Living's TCR fell 32.1 from 35.9 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 35.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=35.9 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 244% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #321/635
  • PHOTO The Villages at Fore…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Villages at Forest Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sundial Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sundial Assisted Living averages 9.3 TCR (244% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sundial Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=35.9 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Sundial Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #321 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Sundial Assisted Living (33 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sundial Assisted Living
Sundial Assisted Living (33 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Sundial Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 35.9 20.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Redding

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Villages at Forest Springs 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Murano Senior Living 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EB Care at Farmingville 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Annandale Senior Services, LLC 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR KC Jones Plating 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UVA Medical Center TCH/Northridge 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Meriden Center 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ctv 51 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spee-Dee Delivery Service, Inc. - Bismarck 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mifflin Court 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Springdale Lab 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE RIC - Residence Inn Crabtree 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.