Senior citizens' homes without nursing care · Washington

Merrill Gardens at the University

Seattle, WA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Merrill Gardens at the University runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Senior citizens' homes without nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Merrill Gardens at the University: 5.1 TCR = 135% of Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Merrill Gardens at the University safety composite

Merrill Gardens at the University scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.0

2018→2023

Merrill Gardens at the University injury rate improved

Merrill Gardens at the University's TCR fell 12.0 from 12.2 in 2018 to 0.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.2 · 2021=3.1 · 2023=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 135% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #45/216
  • PHOTO Cornerstone Management
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cornerstone Management (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Merrill Gardens at the University in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Merrill Gardens at the University averages 5.1 TCR (135% of the Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Merrill Gardens at the University TCR series: 2018=12.2 · 2021=3.1 · 2023=0.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Merrill Gardens at the University falls in its industry

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 216 Senior citizens' homes without employers in Washington.

Merrill Gardens at the University (64 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Merrill Gardens at the University
Merrill Gardens at the University (64 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Merrill Gardens at the University has more employees than the Senior citizens' homes without nursing c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.2 0.1 7 0 0
2021 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 12.2 12.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Seattle

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Management 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LakeHouse Lake Mills 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63042 SUNRISE OF PIKESVILLE 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63054 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sagebrush Ranches LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell Substation 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kennewick General Office 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Riverside Methodist Hospital 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 832 W 22nd St Tempe Az 85282 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Agropur - Luxemburg 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Radisson Hotel Chatsworth 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant/Field Departments 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Pointe Senior Living 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA.PITTS.98 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Security and Fire Electronics Inc 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.