Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Sterling Pointe Senior Living

Princeton, MN · ~64 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Pointe Senior Living runs at 285% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sterling Pointe Senior Living: 10.8 TCR = 285% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Pointe Senior Living safety composite

Sterling Pointe Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sterling Pointe Senior Living: 3.2 → 22.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 22.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.11× in 2023

Sterling Pointe Senior Living's TCR rose 19.6 from 3.2 in 2018 to 22.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Princeton, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 285% of ind

  • DART 22.8 DART
  • RANK #148/226
  • PHOTO Greenridge Place
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenridge Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Pointe Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Pointe Senior Living averages 10.8 TCR (285% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sterling Pointe Senior Living TCR series: 2018=3.2 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=10 · 2023=22.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Sterling Pointe Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #148 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Sterling Pointe Senior Living (64 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Pointe Senior Living
Sterling Pointe Senior Living (64 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Sterling Pointe Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 22.8 22.8 0 1 0
2021 10.0 10.0 2 1 0
2020 8.9 8.9 0 3 0
2019 9.2 6.1 2 1 0
2018 3.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Princeton

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 45 employers in Princeton, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenridge Place 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxford Owasso Memory Care, LLC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - Westland Joy 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courtyard Fountains 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS PRIDE HATCHERIES 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeborn Mower Electric Cooperative 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nativity of the Blessed Virgin 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Grace Construction, Inc. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV Northland Medical Center 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crystal Cabinet Works, Inc. 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3102 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Princeton1 259 FTE
NAT-TCR Food 4 Less - March Lane 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bement Health Care 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Altair Enviromental Group 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR OrePac Building Products - Spokane 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE PA.PITTS.98 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merrill Gardens at the University 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Security and Fire Electronics Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hayden Station-948 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.