Commercial building construction general contractors · Ohio

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region

Dayton, OH · ~98 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region: 0.6 TCR = 21% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region safety composite

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2023→2024

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region injury rate improved

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=1.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Dayton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/220
  • PHOTO Glenn H. Johnson Con…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glenn H. Johnson Construction Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region averages 0.6 TCR (21% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region TCR series: 2023=1.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 220 Commercial building constructi employers in Ohio.

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region (98 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region
Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region (98 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Messer Construction Co. - Dayton Region has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OH · Dayton

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glenn H. Johnson Construction Co. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nigro Construction Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pumford Construction 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3020243 - DEN Great Hall Phase 2 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 70K 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE HQ 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction - Dayton, OH 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Allied Enterprises, Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR John Crane Swedesboro 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Emporia Flex Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hemphill Home Care 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Geomet Recycling LLC 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE HB Farmer Foundation 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Bakery, Inc. 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midway Auto Parts 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.