Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing · North Carolina

Metal-Cad Steel Framing

Wilmington, NC · ~88 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metal-Cad Steel Framing runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Metal-Cad Steel Framing: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metal-Cad Steel Framing safety composite

Metal-Cad Steel Framing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Metal-Cad Steel Framing held a steady TCR band

Metal-Cad Steel Framing's TCR held near 0.1 from 8.7 in 2018 to 8.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 300.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.7 · 2019=300.0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332321 · Wilmington, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #12/15
  • PHOTO Elizabethton
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elizabethton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Metal-Cad Steel Framing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metal-Cad Steel Framing averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metal-Cad Steel Framing TCR series: 2018=8.7 · 2019=300 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Metal-Cad Steel Framing falls in its industry

515 Frames, door and window, metal establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 15 Frames, door and window, metal employers in North Carolina.

Metal-Cad Steel Framing (88 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metal-Cad Steel Framing
Metal-Cad Steel Framing (88 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Metal-Cad Steel Framing has more employees than the Frames, door and window, metal, manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 3.8 7 0 0
2023 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2021 9.4 1.4 4 3 0
2020 1.9 0.0 0 2 0
2019 300.0 0.0 4 2 0
2018 8.7 1.4 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332321 · NC · Wilmington

515 Frames, door and window, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 360 employers in Wilmington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elizabethton 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Performance Glass, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rehme Steel Windows & Doors 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CURRIES 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Public Utilities 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayliss Boatworks Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE BU 3434 - I-40_I-77 Statesville, NC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Young and McQueen Grading Company Inc 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center 6,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover Regional Medical Center 4,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas 1,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover County Government 1,974 FTE
NAT-TCR Beretania Store 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bandy Manufacturing, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mclaren Oakland 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodbine School 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wheeler Services, Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFP Ukiah Sawmill Division 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Placement Partners MN, Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCN Capital LLC 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.