Footing and foundation concrete contractors · Georgia

Wheeler Services, Inc

Alpharetta, GA · ~88 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wheeler Services, Inc runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Footing and foundation concrete contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Wheeler Services, Inc: 2.0 TCR = 72% of Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wheeler Services, Inc safety composite

Wheeler Services, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Wheeler Services, Inc held a steady TCR band

Wheeler Services, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Alpharetta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/32
  • PHOTO CONCRETE SYSTEMS INC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CONCRETE SYSTEMS INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Wheeler Services, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wheeler Services, Inc averages 2.0 TCR (72% of the Footing and foundation concrete contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wheeler Services, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Wheeler Services, Inc falls in its industry

1,314 Footing and foundation concret establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 32 Footing and foundation concret employers in Georgia.

Wheeler Services, Inc (88 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wheeler Services, Inc
Wheeler Services, Inc (88 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Wheeler Services, Inc has more employees than the Footing and foundation concrete contract median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 1 1 0
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 7.1 5.9 5 1 0
2019 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 4.7 4.7 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · GA · Alpharetta

1,314 Footing and foundation concrete contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CONCRETE SYSTEMS INC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timber Wolf Excavating, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolff Construction, LP 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coastal Drilling East, LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CVB Industrial Contracting INC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE INTERFACE FLOR LLC KYLE II 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Race Brothers Farm & Home Supply 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Consolidated Electric Service, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR i3 Assembly, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Service Steel Aerospace - Canton OH 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metal-Cad Steel Framing 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFP Ukiah Sawmill Division 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Placement Partners MN, Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCN Capital LLC 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.