Precision turned product manufacturing · Ohio

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2

Mentor, OH · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Precision turned product manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2: 3.6 TCR = 110% of Precision turned product manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 safety composite

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2: 1.9 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2's TCR rose 1.4 from 1.9 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332721 · Mentor, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 110% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/56
  • PHOTO M&K Engineering Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M&K Engineering Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 averages 3.6 TCR (110% of the Precision turned product manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 falls in its industry

464 Precision turned product manuf establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 56 Precision turned product manuf employers in Ohio.

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 (40 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2
Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 (40 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 has fewer employees than the Precision turned product manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 6.7 3.4 2 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 3.3 1.7 2 0 0
2016 1.9 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332721 · OH · Mentor

464 Precision turned product manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 180 employers in Mentor, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M&K Engineering Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Criterion Barrels, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sparkman Industries, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sorenson Engineering, Inc. 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Croton Pullet 2 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chemsteel Construction Company 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE BluSky Restoration Contractors Toledo 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Construction Company LLC (Akron) 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steris HQ 835 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERIS 612 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avery Dennison - Materials Group Building 22 612 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Lincoln Electric Company - Mentor 514 FTE
NAT-TCR Raley's 106- Reno 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR South 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Samuel Merritt University (215-350HAW) 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Grande Communicaitons Odessa 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Somerford Place of Roseville 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sigma - Houston 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dun Rite Excavating Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3006 Keystone Stockton 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.