Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Somerford Place of Roseville

Roseville, CA · ~40 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Somerford Place of Roseville runs at 494% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Somerford Place of Roseville: 18.8 TCR = 494% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Somerford Place of Roseville safety composite

Somerford Place of Roseville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Somerford Place of Roseville: 25.4 → 58.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 58.4 TCR · DART/TCR 3.11× in 2020

Somerford Place of Roseville's TCR rose 33.0 from 25.4 in 2017 to 58.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 3.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Roseville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.8 · 494% of ind

  • DART 58.4 DART
  • RANK #195/216
  • PHOTO The Residence at Pen…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Residence at Penniman Hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Somerford Place of Roseville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Somerford Place of Roseville averages 18.8 TCR (494% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Somerford Place of Roseville TCR series: 2017=25.4 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=58.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Somerford Place of Roseville falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #195 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Somerford Place of Roseville (40 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Somerford Place of Roseville
Somerford Place of Roseville (40 employees, TCR 18.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Somerford Place of Roseville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 58.4 58.4 2 17 0
2019 12.1 12.1 4 0 0
2017 25.4 25.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Roseville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Penniman Hill 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charleston Place 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corcoran 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkview Estates 18.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stackhouse Brothers 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE PISTACHIO HARVESTING, INC. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watsonville/San Juan Bautista 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gomez Growers 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Crestview Center 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Center for Autism Spectrum & Developmental Disorders 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR County of Eaton 18.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlington Vt - 036 18.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metal Seal Precision, Ltd. - Plant 2 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sigma - Houston 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Products, Inc. - Cherokee 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michels Tunneling- New Berlin 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.