Recovering and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) from scrap · North Carolina

Metallix Refining, Inc.

Greenville, NC · ~82 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metallix Refining, Inc. runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Recovering and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) from scrap workplace, earning a grade D.

Metallix Refining, Inc.: 5.7 TCR = 173% of Recovering and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) from scrap BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metallix Refining, Inc. safety composite

Metallix Refining, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metallix Refining, Inc.: 5.0 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2024

Metallix Refining, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.8 from 5.0 in 2016 to 6.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331492 · Greenville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 173% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Atomized Products Gr…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atomized Products Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Metallix Refining, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metallix Refining, Inc. averages 5.7 TCR (173% of the Recovering and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) from scrap BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metallix Refining, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=7.8 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Metallix Refining, Inc. falls in its industry

132 Recovering and refining of non establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Recovering and refining of non employers in North Carolina.

Metallix Refining, Inc. (82 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metallix Refining, Inc.
Metallix Refining, Inc. (82 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Metallix Refining, Inc. has more employees than the Recovering and refining of nonferrous me median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 4.5 5 1 0
2023 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2017 7.8 3.1 5 0 0
2016 5.0 1.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331492 · NC · Greenville

132 Recovering and refining of nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) from scrap employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 203 employers in Greenville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atomized Products Group 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-PA97 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conecsus LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Element Resources 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Wade Glover Farms Inc. 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE SouthEnd Exteriors 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE CT Wilson Construction Company 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE JAMES L CAYTON ACCOCIATES INC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vidant Medical Center 6,615 FTE
CITY-NEAR East Carolina Univeristy Core Campus 6,489 FTE
CITY-NEAR ECU Health Medical Center 6,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pitt County Schools 3,499 FTE
NAT-TCR Ephrata Precision Parts Inc 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR North Florida Retirement Village 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Merrill Fabrication 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Complete Fire Solutions, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arnoff Moving & Storage, Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mantey Heights Stellar Senior Living 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE DKG & Associates Inc. 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kalispell Hotel 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.