Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Connecticut

Metallurgical Processing, Inc.

New Britain, CT · ~53 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metallurgical Processing, Inc. runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Metallurgical Processing, Inc.: 5.3 TCR = 161% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metallurgical Processing, Inc. safety composite

Metallurgical Processing, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2022

Metallurgical Processing, Inc. injury rate improved

Metallurgical Processing, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.4 from 7.6 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.6 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · New Britain, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 161% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #6/11
  • PHOTO Atmosphere Annealing…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atmosphere Annealing Canton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Metallurgical Processing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metallurgical Processing, Inc. averages 5.3 TCR (161% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metallurgical Processing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=4 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Metallurgical Processing, Inc. falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 11 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Connecticut.

Metallurgical Processing, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metallurgical Processing, Inc.
Metallurgical Processing, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Metallurgical Processing, Inc. has more employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2019 5.9 5.9 3 0 0
2018 10.2 10.2 4 0 0
2017 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2016 7.6 7.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · CT · New Britain

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 113 employers in New Britain, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atmosphere Annealing Canton 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR THERMOFUSION INC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Treaters Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paulo - St. Louis 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE NA-US-CT-Milford-Cascade Boulevard 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE 662 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocky Hill 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ulbrich Shaped Wire Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campus 2,582 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOSPITAL OF CENTRAL CT-NB 2,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hospital of Central Connecticut-NB 2,042 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital For Special Care 1,176 FTE
NAT-TCR Trilogy Home Healthcare-Port St. Lucie 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Irvine Mechanical, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Greenbush 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Pavilion at Creekwood 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 8013 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Butler Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fidelitone - Goodlettsville, TN 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 115 Phoenix Metals Kansas City 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.