Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade · Minnesota

Metal Treaters Inc.

Saint Paul, MN · ~59 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metal Treaters Inc. runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Metal Treaters Inc.: 5.3 TCR = 162% of Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metal Treaters Inc. safety composite

Metal Treaters Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metal Treaters Inc.: 3.2 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2024

Metal Treaters Inc.'s TCR rose 2.0 from 3.2 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Saint Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 162% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Bodycote Thermal Pro…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Fort Wayne (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Metal Treaters Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metal Treaters Inc. averages 5.3 TCR (162% of the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metal Treaters Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Metal Treaters Inc. falls in its industry

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Hardening (i.e., heat treating employers in Minnesota.

Metal Treaters Inc. (59 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metal Treaters Inc.
Metal Treaters Inc. (59 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Metal Treaters Inc. has more employees than the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2023 5.4 5.4 0 3 0
2022 11.5 9.6 6 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2020 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 8.3 6.7 5 0 0
2017 3.2 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · MN · Saint Paul

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Fort Wayne 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metallurgical Processing, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRI CITY HEAT TREAT 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atmosphere Annealing Canton 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE JDR Technologies, LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7580 Commerce Lane NE, Fridley, MN 55432 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advantage Seamless, Inc. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauk Rapids, MN (All State) 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR Compton 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dearborn Brothers Construction, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Carson City Office 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Springfield, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Malabs Los Angeles 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 109CRL 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Personnel Department, Medical Services Division 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 401KWD 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.