Distribution of electric power · Georgia

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro

Atlanta, GA · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade A.

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro: 0.5 TCR = 41% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro safety composite

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro held a steady TCR band

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/149
  • PHOTO Marshalltown Gen Sta…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marshalltown Gen Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro averages 0.5 TCR (41% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 149 Distribution of electric power employers in Georgia.

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro (29 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro
Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro (29 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · GA · Atlanta

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marshalltown Gen Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR GLOUCESTER 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glade Spring Svc Ctr 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR N Charleston Svc Ctr 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta TMC - 805 W. Savannah Ave. Valdosta, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Operating - 1037 Marietta Hwy Canton 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Afc Industries 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR US - Branch Network : 0723 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-Con Services, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Virgin Atlantic-Jfk Ny 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Golden Valley PN Clinic 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peninsula 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Rigging and Tools, Inc - Baton Rouge 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.