Health Services · Minnesota

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic

Maple Grove, MN · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Health Services workplace, earning a grade B.

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic: 2.5 TCR = 66% of Health Services BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic safety composite

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.2

2017→2022

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic injury rate improved

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic's TCR fell 11.2 from 11.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.2 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Maple Grove, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #115/419
  • PHOTO Olmsted Township Exp…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Olmsted Township Express Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic averages 2.5 TCR (66% of the Health Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic TCR series: 2017=11.2 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic falls in its industry

2,836 Health Services establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #115 safest of 419 Health Services employers in Minnesota.

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic (29 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic
Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic (29 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Maple Grove No Memorial Clinic has fewer employees than the Health Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 11.2 7.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Maple Grove

2,836 Health Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 238 employers in Maple Grove, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Olmsted Township Express Care 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10 Medical Plaza 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orthopedic Institute of Pennsylvania- Carlisle 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hainesport-Creek Crossing 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Corporation 5,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNMPL - MAPLE GROVE 932 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE GROVE (MNMPL) 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Oakley Ind Operating - 7365 Oakley Industrial Blvd. Union City 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Copley Place 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ics Materials, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland (formerly Bonita Packaging Products Inc.) 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canton Operating - 1037 Marietta Hwy Canton 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.