Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Ohio

Meyer Tool, Inc.

Cincinnati, OH · ~587 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meyer Tool, Inc. runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Meyer Tool, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meyer Tool, Inc. safety composite

Meyer Tool, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Meyer Tool, Inc.: 2.7 → 5291.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5291.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1259.76× in 2024

Meyer Tool, Inc.'s TCR rose 5288.3 from 2.7 in 2018 to 5291.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1259.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 2380.9 DART
  • RANK #35/46
  • PHOTO Goodrich - Turbine F…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~587 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodrich - Turbine Fuel Technologies- Carroll IA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Meyer Tool, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meyer Tool, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meyer Tool, Inc. TCR series: 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.4 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=5291 · BLS 3.3

Where Meyer Tool, Inc. falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 46 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Ohio.

Meyer Tool, Inc. (587 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Meyer Tool, Inc.
Meyer Tool, Inc. (587 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Meyer Tool, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5291.0 2380.9 19 1 0
2023 1.6 1.0 11 2 0
2022 1.8 0.4 11 2 0
2021 0.9 0.5 7 0 0
2019 2.4 1.4 20 1 0
2018 2.7 2.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · OH · Cincinnati

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodrich - Turbine Fuel Technologies- Carroll IA 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Steel Tool & Engineering 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCC Aerostructures 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Asheville Rotating Parts 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mane Inc. Lebanon Production 588 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cabinetworks Group Middlefield LLC Plant #3 586 FTE
STATE-SIZE LBrands - Morse Campus 588 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, LLC 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Jacobs - FAYETTEVILLE - OMI 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hollywood Presby Med Ctr Es 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Schaefer Technologies, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Winder, GA - 1291 Hardigree Road 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toledo Store 587 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Dalton GA Industrial Park 587 FTE
NAT-SIZE LSG Sky Chefs Seattle 587 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Office 587 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.