Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing · Indiana

Schaefer Technologies, Inc.

Indianapolis, IN · ~45 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schaefer Technologies, Inc. runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Schaefer Technologies, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schaefer Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Schaefer Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2024

Schaefer Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Schaefer Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.1 from 3.6 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO Nypro
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nypro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Schaefer Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schaefer Technologies, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schaefer Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2018=3.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Schaefer Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

448 Metal casting machinery and eq establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Metal casting machinery and eq employers in Indiana.

Schaefer Technologies, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Schaefer Technologies, Inc.
Schaefer Technologies, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Schaefer Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Metal casting machinery and equipment ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · IN · Indianapolis

448 Metal casting machinery and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nypro 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suburban Tool & Die Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATMCR 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gala Industries, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE J Star Farms LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windfall, IN 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Oil Field Services LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patoka Lake Regional Water & Sewer District 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Winder, GA - 1291 Hardigree Road 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goldsboro, NC - Gateway 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Meyer Tool, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacobs - FAYETTEVILLE - OMI 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pinnacle HR Group, LLC - Bryan Park 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Penn Distribution Salt Lake 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE VTC Pomona 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Student Location 12663 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.