Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · New York

Meyer Tool New York

Middletown, NY · ~84 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meyer Tool New York runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Meyer Tool New York: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meyer Tool New York safety composite

Meyer Tool New York scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Meyer Tool New York injury rate improved

Meyer Tool New York's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.6 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=3.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Middletown, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #6/13
  • PHOTO Lycoming Engines
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lycoming Engines (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Meyer Tool New York in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meyer Tool New York averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meyer Tool New York TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=3.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Meyer Tool New York falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 13 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in New York.

Meyer Tool New York (84 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Meyer Tool New York
Meyer Tool New York (84 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Meyer Tool New York has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.6 0.9 4 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2016 3.6 3.6 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · NY · Middletown

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 124 employers in Middletown, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lycoming Engines 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodward Inc. - WTC Facility 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain Asheville CMC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turbine Technologies, Inc. - CT 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Astoria Generating Station 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bonacio Construction, Inc. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ridgewood Drive 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keleman-Bauer Construction Inc. DBA Edbauer Construction 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY-05 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR ORANGE REGIONAL MEDICAL 2,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY_Middletown_2 Industrial Dr_TW272320 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1959 427 FTE
NAT-TCR Russellville 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ammeraal Beltech, LLC Skokie 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro-Pac, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR BK-Kahului #603 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Administration 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winesburg 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mondelez International Toledo Flour Mill 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Carolina Mechanical, LLC 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.