Electric power transmission line and tower construction · New York

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena

New York, NY · ~154 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power transmission line and tower construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena: 1.7 TCR = 62% of Electric power transmission line and tower construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena safety composite

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2023→2024

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena injury rate improved

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena's TCR fell 0.7 from 2.1 in 2023 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.1 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · New York, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #17/44
  • PHOTO Epic Communications,…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Epic Communications, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena averages 1.7 TCR (62% of the Electric power transmission line and tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena TCR series: 2023=2.1 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena falls in its industry

1,605 Electric power transmission li establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 44 Electric power transmission li employers in New York.

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena (154 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena
Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena (154 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Michels Power Inc-NY-Massena has more employees than the Electric power transmission line and tow median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.5 3 0 0
2023 2.1 0.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NY · New York

1,605 Electric power transmission line and tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Epic Communications, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pike Georgia Statewide Operations 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deerfield Construction Group, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Major Projects_Potelco 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE LPCiminelli Construction Corp 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE MLJ Contracting Corp 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perreca Electric Company Inc. 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Home Builders/Titan Homes 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Integrated Power Services Longview Service Center 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Adventist University 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Roundtrip Transportation 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AES Indiana (T&D) - Morris St Service Center 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saint Therese of Woodbury 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novelis, Inc. 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE PTS Diagnostics 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pech Optical 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.