All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing · Michigan

Michigan Rebuild & Automation

Litchfield, MI · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Rebuild & Automation runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Michigan Rebuild & Automation: 4.7 TCR = 143% of All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Rebuild & Automation safety composite

Michigan Rebuild & Automation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Michigan Rebuild & Automation held a steady TCR band

Michigan Rebuild & Automation's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.8 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.8 · 2018=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Litchfield, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/21
  • PHOTO Adams SFC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Adams SFC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Rebuild & Automation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Rebuild & Automation averages 4.7 TCR (143% of the All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan Rebuild & Automation TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Michigan Rebuild & Automation falls in its industry

242 All Other Miscellaneous Genera establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 21 All Other Miscellaneous Genera employers in Michigan.

Michigan Rebuild & Automation (21 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Rebuild & Automation
Michigan Rebuild & Automation (21 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Michigan Rebuild & Automation has fewer employees than the All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · MI · Litchfield

242 All Other Miscellaneous General Purpose Machinery Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 9 employers in Litchfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Adams SFC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilliard Fourth Street 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Western Manufacturing Co. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omnipure Filter Company 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms Sturgis 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BE Cultivation 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4605_15228 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willard DeHaan & Son Grnhs 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hi-Lex Controls, Inc. (HCIL) 422 FTE
CITY-NEAR HI-LEX Litchfield (HCIL) 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raker-Roberta's Young Plants 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR HI-LEX Litchfield (HCIC) 126 FTE
NAT-TCR Northwest Community Healthcare Heart & Vascular Specialists 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR All Seasonings Ingredients - Oneida, NY 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Linde- Brandon 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Reading - PRD 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Cleveland 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Cincinnati Gest St 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pine Kirk Care Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE S07094 - 1370 S Valley Hwy Office 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.