Retail · Guam
Micronesia 468
Dededo, GU · ~354 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 12.9
- Avg TCR
- 3.4
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Micronesia 468 runs at 378% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retail workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 12.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.4
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 56
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Micronesia 468's OSHA Total Case Rate of 12.9 to the Retail BLS benchmark of 3.4 (378% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Micronesia 468's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.4 industry benchmark.
Where Micronesia 468 falls in its industry
2,383 Retail establishmentsSafer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.
Trend analysis for Micronesia 468
Between 2016 and 2017, Micronesia 468's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 12.8 to 12.9 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 0% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 12.8, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 12.9, a spread of 0.1 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Micronesia 468 recorded 56 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 56 injuries shown on this page for Micronesia 468 are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 452111 - Retail.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2017)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 403,288 hours worked = 0.50 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Micronesia 468 (this establishment) | 12.86 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Department stores (except discount department stores) industry avg | 3.40 | BLS IIF, NAICS 452111 |
| Guam state avg (all industries) | 2.60 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Micronesia 468 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2017: 26 reportable incidents · 26 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 30 reportable incidents · 30 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 12.9 | 0.5 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12.8 | 0.0 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Micronesia 468's reported OSHA injury record versus its Retail peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 378% of the Retail benchmark, Micronesia 468 reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Retail sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Micronesia 468's safety grade?
How many injuries has Micronesia 468 reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Guam, and by nearby establishments in Dededo - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~12.9)
Similar size (~354 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.