Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Tennessee

Mid-South Metallurgical

Murfreesboro, TN · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid-South Metallurgical runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Mid-South Metallurgical: 7.2 TCR = 218% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid-South Metallurgical safety composite

Mid-South Metallurgical scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2017→2018

Mid-South Metallurgical injury rate improved

Mid-South Metallurgical's TCR fell 4.9 from 9.6 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.6 · 2018=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Murfreesboro, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 218% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO 06 - Paulding (TD)
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 06 - Paulding (TD) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Mid-South Metallurgical in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid-South Metallurgical averages 7.2 TCR (218% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid-South Metallurgical TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2018=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Mid-South Metallurgical falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Tennessee.

Mid-South Metallurgical (20 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid-South Metallurgical
Mid-South Metallurgical (20 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Mid-South Metallurgical has fewer employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.8 0.0 0 1 0
2017 9.6 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · TN · Murfreesboro

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 256 employers in Murfreesboro, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 06 - Paulding (TD) 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Blade Steel 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WWP 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Akron Steel Treating Company 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Machine Harvest 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia DREMC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CEMC-Gallatin 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Murfreesboro 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR TNNAS16 ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA3 1,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA3 1,708 FTE
NAT-TCR HealthTrust Supply Chain Jacksonville Warehouse 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4360 CHINO HILLS, CA 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 219 - Duluth-MN 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0019 4316 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Save-A-Lot #24335 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Esm Group Inc. - Kingsbury, in 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wisconsin Branch 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.