Distribution of natural gas · Tennessee

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District

Smithville, TN · ~146 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District runs at 307% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade F.

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District: 3.7 TCR = 307% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District safety composite

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District: 0.9 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.23× in 2024

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.9 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Smithville, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.7 · 307% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #13/19
  • PHOTO Valley
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District averages 3.7 TCR (307% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2018=5 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 19 Distribution of natural gas employers in Tennessee.

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District (146 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District
Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District (146 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Middle Tennessee Natural Gas Utility District has more employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 0.8 3 1 0
2023 5.2 2.6 6 0 0
2022 5.1 0.0 6 0 0
2021 3.4 0.9 4 0 0
2020 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2019 4.1 0.8 5 0 0
2018 5.0 0.8 6 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · TN · Smithville

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 25 employers in Smithville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Valley 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3510 COLEMAN RD PADUCAH KY 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sevier County Utility District 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WGL MD - Chillum Road 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Johnson & Galyon, Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE HC CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tele-Optics Communication Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE KNOXVILLE - PKG TN 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal-Mogul Motorparts 533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tenneco Smithville 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal-Mogul Corporation 438 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHIROKI North America - Smithville 423 FTE
NAT-TCR Humboldt Bay Inn 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 405 Brockport 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Impact Guard LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Countryside Property Maintenance LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Catholic Charities, Inc., Diocese of Madison 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tower Glass Inc 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Osborn Health and Rehabilitation 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Commons 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.