Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees · Texas

Middleton Unit Clinic

Abilene, TX · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Middleton Unit Clinic runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees workplace, earning a grade D.

Middleton Unit Clinic: 7.1 TCR = 187% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Middleton Unit Clinic safety composite

Middleton Unit Clinic scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Middleton Unit Clinic: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 28.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2023

Middleton Unit Clinic's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 28.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Abilene, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 187% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #19/21
  • PHOTO Diamond Neighborhood…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Diamond Neighborhoods FHC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Middleton Unit Clinic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Middleton Unit Clinic averages 7.1 TCR (187% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Middleton Unit Clinic TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=28.5 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=4 · BLS 3.8

Where Middleton Unit Clinic falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 21 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in Texas.

Middleton Unit Clinic (34 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Middleton Unit Clinic
Middleton Unit Clinic (34 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Middleton Unit Clinic has fewer employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2022 4.2 0.0 0 1 0
2021 16.3 8.1 4 0 0
2020 28.5 24.9 8 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · TX · Abilene

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners with multi-industry degrees employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 238 employers in Abilene, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Diamond Neighborhoods FHC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillcrest FHC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allegiance- Cardiac Testing 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prattville Medical Park 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTHWEST FEED YARD 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Tulia 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR HENDRICK MEDICAL CENTER 3,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hendrick Medical Center South 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abilene CCD 573 FTE
NAT-TCR Las Vegas Electric Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR AMI 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Veg-Land, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR American TransMed Inc 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dig-It Inc. Hastings MI 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trego/Dugan Aviation of GI RNO 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Creek of Lakewood, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highway Equipment Company - Millstone, NJ 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.