Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing · Michigan

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc.

Roseville, MI · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. safety composite

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−105.0

2017→2024

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. injury rate improved

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc.'s TCR fell 105.0 from 108.3 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 108.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=108.3 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=56.5 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333612 · Roseville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO RegalRexnord
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RegalRexnord (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. TCR series: 2017=108.3 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=56.5 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. falls in its industry

106 Drives, high-speed industrial establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Drives, high-speed industrial employers in Michigan.

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. (42 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc.
Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. (42 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. has fewer employees than the Drives, high-speed industrial (except hy median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 56.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2017 108.3 54.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333612 · MI · Roseville

106 Drives, high-speed industrial (except hydrostatic), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 82 employers in Roseville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RegalRexnord 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danfoss LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precipart 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Master Power Transmission 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Meter 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Jackson 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennings & Sons 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Meyer - Muskegon 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4003 - TPG/PBM 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4002 - TPG/PBS (inc 4009) 565 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2959 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCO Engineering, Inc. 417 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Santa Rosa County S.B. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Economy Pest Control, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SW Stationary & Bank Supply 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cabrillo Marine Aquarium 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lake Havasu 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mammoth Community Water District 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prescription Landscape - Shakopee Office 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Justice Center 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.