Water treatment and distribution · California

Mammoth Community Water District

Mammoth Lakes, CA · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mammoth Community Water District runs at 148% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade D.

Mammoth Community Water District: 1.8 TCR = 148% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mammoth Community Water District safety composite

Mammoth Community Water District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2024

Mammoth Community Water District injury rate improved

Mammoth Community Water District's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Mammoth Lakes, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.8 · 148% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/176
  • PHOTO 6032 - Charlotte
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6032 - Charlotte (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mammoth Community Water District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mammoth Community Water District averages 1.8 TCR (148% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mammoth Community Water District TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Mammoth Community Water District falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 176 Water treatment and distributi employers in California.

Mammoth Community Water District (42 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mammoth Community Water District
Mammoth Community Water District (42 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Mammoth Community Water District has fewer employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Mammoth Lakes

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 10 employers in Mammoth Lakes, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6032 - Charlotte 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mark B. Whitaker WP 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Johnson 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois American Water (Chicago Metro) 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, LLC 2,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mammoth Hospital 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 314 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02400 102 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Chesterfield (Mt Clemens) MFG (EF, AUTO) 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nutek Disposables, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Leppinks Belding 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Royal Oak - Public Library 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Havasu 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Gear & Tool, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prescription Landscape - Shakopee Office 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.