Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Mifflin Court

Name: Mifflin Court Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Shillington, PA · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 8.3
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mifflin Court runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mifflin Court: 8.3 TCR = 219% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mifflin Court safety composite

Mifflin Court scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers
DART rate: F 19.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mifflin Court: 0.0 → 19.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 19.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.34× in 2020

Mifflin Court's TCR rose 19.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 19.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Shillington, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 219% of ind

DART 19.5 DART
RANK #135/233
PHOTO Somerby of Mobile
BOOK 3y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Somerby of Mobile (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

This site

8.3
Somerby of Mob

8.3
Sycamore Glen

8.3
Hacienda Del R

8.3
Discovery Vill

8.3

What this shows Mifflin Court averages 8.3 TCR (219% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Mifflin Court TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=19.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Mifflin Court falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Mifflin Court (33 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Mifflin Court has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2020	19.5	19.5	0	7
2019	5.5	0.0	2	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Shillington

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 12 employers in Shillington, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Somerby of Mobile	MOBILE, AL	8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sycamore Glen	CHICO, CA	8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hacienda Del Rey	LITCHFIELD PARK, AZ	8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Discovery Village at Deerwood Independent Living	JACKSONVILLE, FL	8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Caputo & Guest	KENNETT SQUARE	33 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Colver Power Project	COLVER	33 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Oil City	OIL CITY	33 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Norristown Operations	NORRISTOWN	33 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Heritage Campus Green Hills OPCO LLC	Shillington	167 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Mifflin Center	Shillington	130 FTE
CITY-NEAR	178 MIFFLIN CENTER	Shillington	117 FTE
CITY-NEAR	9288-178	Shillington	113 FTE
NAT-TCR	Highway Improvement, Inc.	Sioux Falls, SD	8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Wesco - Haas Group International Sacramento Distribution Center	Rancho Cordova, CA	8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Meijer Store 163	Fort Gratiot, MI	8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Huntington Beach Hauling	Huntington Beach, CA	8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Springdale Lab	Springdale, AR	33 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Sundial Assisted Living	Redding, CA	33 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Spee-Dee Delivery Service, Inc. - Bismarck	Bismarck, ND	33 FTE
NAT-SIZE	RIC - Residence Inn Crabtree	Raleigh, NC	33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.