National Guard · Minnesota

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept

Duluth, MN · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical National Guard workplace, earning a grade D.

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept: 4.3 TCR = 135% of National Guard BLS 3.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept safety composite

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept: 6.6 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept's TCR rose 2.0 from 6.6 in 2017 to 8.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 928110 · Duluth, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 135% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Arlington National C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arlington National Cemetery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept averages 4.3 TCR (135% of the National Guard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=9 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept falls in its industry

36 National Guard establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 National Guard employers in Minnesota.

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept (28 employees, TCR 4.3) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 17 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept
Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept (28 employees, TCR 4.3) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept has fewer employees than the National Guard median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.6 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 9.0 6.0 3 0 0
2018 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2017 6.6 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

928110 · MN · Duluth

36 National Guard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 340 employers in Duluth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arlington National Cemetery 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oregon Youth Challenge Program 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PANG Fire Dept 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Military Affairs - 133rd AW 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shooting Star Native Seeds 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moore Calves 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2528-Glyndon, MN 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worthington Public Utilities 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Mary's Medical Center 3,230 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital of Duluth 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Building D-Miller Dwan Medical Center 1,880 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Duluth 1,701 FTE
NAT-TCR YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Flex 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR West Star Aviation / Chattanooga 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alaska Petroleum- Fairbanks 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powerhouse Entertainment LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howard P. Fairfield Hopkinton 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg District Bridge Crews 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.