Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic · California

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development

San Diego, CA · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic workplace, earning a grade F.

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development: 4.3 TCR = 205% of Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development safety composite

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2021→2023

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development injury rate improved

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.5 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.3 · 205% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/69
  • PHOTO Campbell County YMCA…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Campbell County YMCA Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development averages 4.3 TCR (205% of the Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development TCR series: 2021=4.5 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development falls in its industry

298 Fraternal associations or lodg establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 69 Fraternal associations or lodg employers in California.

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development (61 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development
YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development (61 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

YFS Transitional Housing and Youth Development has fewer employees than the Fraternal associations or lodges, social median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.5 6.3 3 1 0
2021 4.5 4.5 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · CA · San Diego

298 Fraternal associations or lodges, social or civic employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Campbell County YMCA Branch 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA of Metropolitan Chattanooga 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cova Hotel 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pennsylvania Horticultural Society 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silveira Farms 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Brucherie Produce, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olds Ranch 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1750 Production Office 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Military Affairs - 148th FW - Fire Dept 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Centennial 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Flex 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Myer Construction Corporation 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Florida Mall 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rinehart Targets 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Roads District Bridge Crews 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE LH- 51 Schooner 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.