National Guard · Minnesota

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD)

Saint Paul, MN · ~161 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical National Guard workplace, earning a grade F.

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD): 7.3 TCR = 228% of National Guard BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) safety composite

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2020→2023

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) injury rate improved

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD)'s TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 20.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.4 · 2021=20.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 928110 · Saint Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 228% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Camp Rilea
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~161 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Camp Rilea (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) averages 7.3 TCR (228% of the National Guard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) TCR series: 2020=5.4 · 2021=20 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) falls in its industry

36 National Guard establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 National Guard employers in Minnesota.

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) (161 employees, TCR 7.3) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 17 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD)
Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) (161 employees, TCR 7.3) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Military Affairs --- State Active Duty (SAD) has more employees than the National Guard median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 2.6 5 1 0
2021 20.0 5.0 18 2 0
2020 5.4 1.3 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

928110 · MN · Saint Paul

36 National Guard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Camp Rilea 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camp Dodge 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Department of Military Affairs 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Military Affairs - Camp Ripley Training Center 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kerry Blue Earth 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSEVILLE MN PLANT 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wis-Pak of Mankato and La Crosse 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northland Process Piping 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR NA-US-NJ-Blackwood-Lower Landing Road 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR West Michigan Beef 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Middlewoods of Farmington 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SGS Retail - Hanford 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Asco Aerospace USA 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE premier truck group of oklahoma city 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Torotel Products Inc 161 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutton Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Prairie Estates 161 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.