Skilled nursing facilities · Minnesota

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care

Onamia, MN · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care: 15.2 TCR = 233% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care safety composite

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care: 9.1 → 13.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 23.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2019

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care's TCR rose 4.2 from 9.1 in 2017 to 13.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Onamia, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.2 · 233% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #365/430
  • PHOTO Bloomignton RHCC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bloomignton RHCC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care averages 15.2 TCR (233% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care TCR series: 2017=9.1 · 2018=23.2 · 2019=13.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #365 safest of 430 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Minnesota.

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care (54 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care
Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care (54 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 13.2 9.9 8 0 0
2018 23.2 16.3 10 0 0
2017 9.1 9.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Onamia

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 13 employers in Onamia, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bloomignton RHCC 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUMMERFORD NURSING HOME, INC. 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imperial Heights Healthcare 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senior Care of West Oaks 15.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 09 Eveleth 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elder-Jones Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haldeman Homme, Inc. - Minneapolis - Corporate 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mille Lacs Health System Hospital 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mille Lacs Health System - Hospital 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mille Lacs Health System - Long Term Care 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Onamia Elementary School 57 FTE
NAT-TCR Tomra NY Recycling- Rotterdam 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Allwaste Services, Inc 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior Care of West Oaks 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dollar General (WC USX JON) 15.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cellofoam-Conyers, GA-FAB 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duncan Medical 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCATR01 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parker Service Center - Waterville 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.