Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · South Carolina

Dollar General (WC USX JON)

Jonesville, SC · ~87 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dollar General (WC USX JON) runs at 337% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Dollar General (WC USX JON): 15.2 TCR = 337% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dollar General (WC USX JON) safety composite

Dollar General (WC USX JON) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2021

Dollar General (WC USX JON) injury rate improved

Dollar General (WC USX JON)'s TCR fell 3.6 from 17.7 in 2016 to 14.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.7 · 2017=12.9 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=10.0 · 2020=24.7 · 2021=14.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Jonesville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.2 · 337% of ind

  • DART 14.1 DART
  • RANK #71/71
  • PHOTO 320982
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 101 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 320982 (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Dollar General (WC USX JON) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dollar General (WC USX JON) averages 15.2 TCR (337% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dollar General (WC USX JON) TCR series: 2016=17.7 · 2017=12.9 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=10 · 2020=24.7 · 2021=14.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Dollar General (WC USX JON) falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 71 Motor freight carrier, general employers in South Carolina.

Dollar General (WC USX JON) (87 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dollar General (WC USX JON)
Dollar General (WC USX JON) (87 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Dollar General (WC USX JON) has more employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 14.1 14.1 5 0 0
2020 24.7 23.2 16 0 0
2019 10.0 10.0 7 0 0
2018 11.7 10.1 15 0 0
2017 12.9 12.9 23 0 0
2016 17.7 15.2 35 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · SC · Jonesville

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 7 employers in Jonesville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 320982 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crete, NE 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dollar General (WC USX DGB) 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family Dollar (WC USX FDI) 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE McCrory Construction LLC 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sloan Charleston 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE RJ Martin National Contracting, Inc. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Refresco - Greer Plant 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jonesville DC 773 FTE
CITY-NEAR STR0785 506 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken and Company - Cedar Hill Plant 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken & Co/Cedar Hill 170 FTE
NAT-TCR Imperial Heights Healthcare 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vans Distribution Center - Corona 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mille Lacs Health System Long Term Care 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Summerford Nursing Home, Inc. 15.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE MFC Corp 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memorial Medical Nursing Center 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beckerle Lumber Supply Co. Inc.- Spring Valley 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windermere Health and Rehabilitation Center 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.