Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Kentucky

Millennium Forge Inc.

Louisville, KY · ~81 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
29.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Millennium Forge Inc. runs at 886% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade F.

Millennium Forge Inc.: 29.2 TCR = 886% of Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Millennium Forge Inc. safety composite

Millennium Forge Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 29.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.6

2016→2020

Millennium Forge Inc. injury rate improved

Millennium Forge Inc.'s TCR fell 15.6 from 38.3 in 2016 to 22.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 38.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=38.3 · 2017=25.7 · 2019=30.2 · 2020=22.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Louisville, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 29.2 · 886% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO KT Acquisition LLC d…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 81 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KT Acquisition LLC dba Komtek Forge (5.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Millennium Forge Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Millennium Forge Inc. averages 29.2 TCR (886% of the Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Millennium Forge Inc. TCR series: 2016=38.3 · 2017=25.7 · 2019=30.2 · 2020=22.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Millennium Forge Inc. falls in its industry

241 Hot forgings made from purchas establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Hot forgings made from purchas employers in Kentucky.

Millennium Forge Inc. (81 employees, TCR 29.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Millennium Forge Inc.
Millennium Forge Inc. (81 employees, TCR 29.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Millennium Forge Inc. has fewer employees than the Hot forgings made from purchased iron or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 22.7 12.4 11 0 0
2019 30.2 18.4 28 0 0
2017 25.7 19.3 24 0 0
2016 38.3 21.3 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · KY · Louisville

241 Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 1,638 employers in Louisville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KT Acquisition LLC dba Komtek Forge 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Forging Co. 22.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson Division 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medico Industries, Inc. Sunshine 20.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FPB -Service Center 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Xpert Design & Construction 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.W. Wilburn, Inc. 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE EXCEL Maintenance @ Westlake, Calvert City KY 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Public Schools 18,524 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYGRA - WORLDPORT 11,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORLDPORT (KYGRA) 9,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTKY TRUCK 8,757 FTE
NAT-TCR MCAP Chesterfield Township Opco, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at New Baltimore 29.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cottage Grove Commons 29.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0307 29.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Delivery Systems 29.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE HNL-SPUSA 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester Tech Park 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE World Headquarters & Distribution 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Welkin Mechanical 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.