Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Alabama

Miller Steam Plant

Quinton, AL · ~344 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Miller Steam Plant runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

Miller Steam Plant: 2.0 TCR = 170% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Miller Steam Plant safety composite

Miller Steam Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Miller Steam Plant held a steady TCR band

Miller Steam Plant's TCR held near 0.1 from 2.1 in 2022 to 2.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.1 · 2023=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Quinton, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 170% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #24/28
  • PHOTO 300A
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~344 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 300A (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Miller Steam Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Miller Steam Plant averages 2.0 TCR (170% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Miller Steam Plant TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=2 · BLS 1.2

Where Miller Steam Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 28 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Alabama.

Miller Steam Plant (344 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Miller Steam Plant
Miller Steam Plant (344 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Miller Steam Plant has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.0 1.4 7 0 0
2022 2.1 0.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AL · Quinton

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 8 employers in Quinton, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 300A 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rocky Mountain Energy Center 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casco Bay Energy Company LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brandon Shores 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SABIC, BKV, AL 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Automotive Components Anniston 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2111 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 662 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miller Fossil Plant 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Generation Fossil Miller Steam Plant 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fossil Generation Miller Steam Plant 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miller Steam Plant - APC 347 FTE
NAT-TCR Ui 4811 (Dearborn - M) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Traditions of Deerfield 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #23 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE L. F. Jennings, Inc. 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glacial Ridge Health System 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metra Electronics Corporation 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montebello Ca Plant 344 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.